Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View RecordsThe FBI Identity History Summary is a fingerprint-based record that an individual can request for personal review.
You want to see the FBI identity-history summary tied to your own fingerprints and correct it if necessary.
You need the official statewide criminal-history product defined by a state police/CJIS agency. Availability, fingerprints, fees, and dissemination rules vary by state.
You need the actual criminal case, filed disposition, judgment, or docket from the court that handled a known prosecution.
An employer is ordering a third-party background report for an employment decision; FCRA process and authorization matter.
A landlord/property manager uses a report that may combine credit, rental, criminal, employment and risk-model data.
The FBI product is intended for you to review your own Identity History Summary and pursue corrections.
The FBI FAQ states this service does not provide name checks; a current fingerprint submission is part of the identity process.
The FBI FAQ lists an $18 fee for each Identity History Summary request; participating USPS fingerprint submission or channeler services can add their own charges.
The FBI says challenges carry no FBI fee and reports an average response time within 45 days after receipt; supporting court/source documentation can help a correction challenge.
| Purpose | Better starting product | Why |
|---|---|---|
| See/correct your own FBI identity history | FBI Identity History Summary | Fingerprint-linked personal review. |
| U.S. job, license, or adoption requiring official screening | Requesting employer/agency or authorized state/federal channel | The FBI review notice says the personal-summary route is not provided for those ordinary authorized-use purposes. |
| Verify one known prosecution | Official court file | The filed disposition/judgment answers the case-specific legal outcome. |
| Check one state’s official criminal repository | State police/CJIS repository | State scope and dissemination rules differ; a county court search is not automatically statewide. |
The FTC guidance says the employer must give a clear standalone written disclosure and obtain written permission before getting a consumer background report.
If report content may cause the employer not to hire, retain, or promote, the person must receive a copy of the consumer report and the FCRA Summary of Rights before the decision is finalized.
The notice identifies the reporting company and explains that the reporting company did not make the employment decision, allowing the person to obtain/dispute the report.
FTC also advises checking state/municipal rules. A generic internet record search does not itself satisfy every employment-screening rule.
The CFPB tenant-screening guide says a tenant report can combine criminal records with credit, rental history, employment verification, registries, watchlists, or a risk score.
If the report caused denial or worse terms, the landlord must identify the reporting company and the fact that the report affected the decision.
The CFPB adverse-action guide states the applicant can request a free copy from the identified screening company within 60 days of adverse action.
Challenge inaccuracies with the reporting company and, for an underlying court/repository error, correct the source record as well.
The decision may depend on non-court components such as credit or rental history, so review the actual consumer report.
| Stage | What to capture | Verification rule |
|---|---|---|
| Repository/name search | Full name used, DOB/identifier if allowed, jurisdiction, lookup date | Treat common-name results as candidates until identity and source scope are checked. |
| Court case | Case number, court, charges, disposition/status | Use the official court for the exact filed outcome rather than a republished summary. |
| Certified document | Document title, certification, issue date | Use when the recipient expressly needs court-certified proof. |
| Consumer report | CRA name, report date, purpose, adverse-action notice if any | Dispute within the report workflow and correct underlying source records where necessary. |
A mismatch can be a same-name problem. Compare DOB/case/other permissible identifiers before deciding the sources conflict.
One product may cover a single county, one state, federal identity history, current custody, or a consumer-report aggregation.
The court that entered the disposition is usually the best place to verify the exact judicial outcome.
If the court/repository is wrong, use its correction process. If the origin is right but a consumer report is wrong, dispute with the consumer reporting company too.
For every background check result, save the purpose, product, jurisdiction, official or reporting-company source, date, identifiers used, and known exclusions. “No result” only has meaning inside that documented scope.